Readiness Scorecard
This chapter summarizes current release readiness by subsystem and ties the score directly to the current hardening ladder.
Overall Readiness
LINC should currently be read as:
- strong on hermetic evidence production
- strong on ELF-first symbol and validation workflows
- useful but more conservative on Mach-O and Windows import-library paths
- meaningfully hardened on vendored and daemon-style fixtures
- still dependent on host availability for the largest OpenSSL and Linux-system ladders
For whole-pipeline claims, this score is also capped by downstream gerc
anchors that ingest linc evidence in tests/examples.
For Level 1 production, this score should be read as Linux/ELF-first. Apple and Windows readiness should raise confidence, not redefine the primary production envelope.
Subsystem Scorecard
- source-shaped intake: high
- JSON artifact stability: high
- ABI layout evidence: medium-high
- symbol inventories: high for ELF, medium-high for Mach-O, medium for Windows
- validation: medium-high
- link planning: medium-high
- hermetic large-surface confidence: high
- host-dependent large-surface confidence: medium-high
- consumer integration on the documented artifact boundary: high
Canonical Readiness Anchors
The release posture should be judged against these anchors first:
- vendored zlib
- vendored libpng
- plugin ABI fixture
- combined daemon fixture
- difficult-record evidence fixtures
- OpenSSL when available
- Linux event-loop analysis when available
If those anchors drift, the scorecard should drop even if many smaller unit tests still pass.
How To Read This Scorecard
High means the subsystem is a reliable contract surface for normal downstream use. Medium-high means consumers should still respect the documented limits and expect some host/platform asymmetry. Medium means the subsystem is useful but should not be oversold as equally mature across all supported environments.